Report No.2/2009 on Studies and Works Carried out under the Landslip Preventive Measures Programme
 

*Introduction

*Background

*Preliminary Studies of Old Slopes

*Detailed Studies of Old Slopes

*Progress of Preliminary and Detailed Studies of Old Slopes

*Dangerous Hillside Orders Served on Private Owners

*Special LPM Studies

*Upgrading Works to Old Government Slopes

*Acceleration of LPM Programme

*10-Year Extended LPM Project

Introduction

This report is on the Landslip Preventive Measures (LPM) Programme and is produced by the Geotechnical Engineering Office (GEO) of the Civil Engineering and Development Department for general distribution. It is issued on a half-yearly basis since October 2003 (before which the report was issued on a quarterly basis) to provide information on the progress of studies and works carried out under this Programme. This report covers progress to 30 September 2009.

Background

Although the GEO has no maintenance responsibility for land, it is responsible for carrying out an initial investigation of both public and private man-made slopes and retaining walls (generally referred to as slopes in this report) which were formed before the GEO was established and could pose a risk to life or property. The GEO also carries out some major slope upgrading works on behalf of other Government departments.

Since 1976, about $12.9 billion has been spent on studies and upgrading works on old (i.e. pre-GEO) slopes under a long-term programme, the LPM Programme. The Programme provides for the investigation, in priority order, of man-made slopes in existence when the GEO (known as the Geotechnical Control Office before 1991) was set up in 1977. The designs of new slopes which have been built since then have generally been checked by the GEO to ensure that they conform with the required safety standards.

The GEO has a Catalogue of Slopes. The original version was prepared in 1977 and 1978. Its original purpose was to provide an inventory of sizeable man-made slopes in existence when the GEO was established and it focused on slopes in the main urban areas of Hong Kong and Kowloon and contained about 10,000 slopes.

However, the original Catalogue of Slopes did not include all slopes formed before 1977, or the many new slopes that have been formed since. In July 1994, the GEO commenced a project entitled "Systematic Identification and Registration of Slopes in the Territory" to compile a new catalogue of all sizeable man-made slopes in Hong Kong. The project was completed in September 1998. Since then, the slope cataloguing exercise has been continuing on a regular basis to include newly constructed or newly identified slopes that meet the slope registration criteria. There are now altogether about 57,000 slopes, including some 2,000 Disturbed Terrain (DT) features, in the Catalogue of Slopes. A comprehensive Slope Information System (SIS) containing pertinent information on the slopes in the New Slope Catalogue has been developed. The SIS is accessible by the public through a computer terminal on the 7th floor of the Civil Engineering and Development Building at 101 Princess Margaret Road, Kowloon. The slope information is also available on the Hong Kong Slope Safety Website (http://hkss.cedd.gov.hk) since March 1999.

Slope owners have a particular interest in the data recorded in the Catalogue of Slopes because they are responsible for maintaining their slopes in a safe condition. All slopes need to be maintained, including old slopes and new slopes which are built to current standards. Routine maintenance works to Government slopes are neither carried out by the GEO nor paid for under LPM funding. In order to establish clear responsibility for maintenance of slopes, the Lands Department commenced a project - Systematic Identification of Maintenance Responsibility of Slopes in the Territory (SIMAR) in June 1996 by engagement of consultants to set up a register of slope maintenance responsibility for all man-made slopes in the New Catalogue. A computerized Slope Maintenance Responsibility Information System has been set up for public access in Lands Department since December 1999.

Government departments responsible for the maintenance of Government slopes allocated to them or under their charge have stepped up their programme of maintenance in accordance with the standard of practice promulgated in Geoguide 5 : Guide to Slope Maintenance. For example, funding to Highways Department for maintenance works to road-side slopes has been increased from $150 million in 1995/96 to about $200 million in 2000/01. Similarly, Architectural Services Department has also received increased funding from $38 million in 1995/96 to about $90 million in 2000/01 to cover the cost of maintenance works to slopes under its charge.

In 1978, the Government undertook to carry out an initial screening of both private and Government man-made slopes in the 1977/78 Catalogue of Slopes under the LPM Programme. This has now been extended to the man-made slopes in the New Catalogue. There are two levels of study under the LPM Programme, which are referred to in this report as Preliminary Studies and Detailed Studies respectively.



Preliminary Studies of Old Slopes

A Preliminary Study essentially consists of a site reconnaissance during which time the consequence of failure is assessed and a subjective judgement made of the likelihood of preventive measures being necessary. While the main purpose of a Preliminary Study is to identify slopes requiring a Detailed Study, it also allows slopes with immediate and obvious signs of danger to be identified, so that any necessary works can be initiated immediately to safeguard public safety.

Detailed Studies of Old Slopes

A Detailed Study is a stability assessment of an existing slope to decide whether upgrading works are necessary. Details of a stability assessment are given in Appendix E of Geoguide 5: Guide to Slope Maintenance. It is based on a desk study, an interpretation of the general area from aerial photographs, site observations, stability analysis, and if necessary, ground investigation. For a private slope, if ground investigation is required to confirm whether or not upgrading works are necessary, the requirement to carry out the ground investigation is normally passed to the private owners by a statutory Dangerous Hillside (DH) Order served by the Buildings Department.


A report on a Detailed Study may:

(a)    recommend upgrading works for Government slopes,
(b)    recommend further investigation and/or upgrading works for private slopes by the service of a Statutory Order by the Buildings Department on private owners,
(c)    recommend other specified action (for which purpose a private owner is advised by an Advisory Letter issued by the Buildings Department), or
(d)    conclude that upgrading works are not required provided the slope is maintained in accordance with the requirements given in Geoguide 5: Guide to Slope Maintenance.

Progress of Preliminary and Detailed Studies of Old Slopes

An indication of the progress of Preliminary Studies over the last 24 years is illustrated in Figure 1(a) and that for Detailed Studies is illustrated in Figure 1(b). It is relevant to note that the Preliminary Studies of all the old slopes in the New Slope Catalogue have been completed. In Figure 1(b), a breakdown of the progress of the Detailed Studies carried out on private slopes (also referred to as safety-screening studies) is also included.

 

Figure 1(a) : Progress of Preliminary Studies

Figure 1(a) : Progress of Preliminary Studies

 

 

Figure 1(b) : Progress of Detailed Studies

Figure 1(b) : Progress of Detailed Studies

 

Dangerous Hillside Orders Served on Private Owners

Where found necessary by a Preliminary Study or a Detailed Study, a DH Order is served by the Buildings Department on the owners of the private slopes on the recommendation of the GEO. The Order requires the owners to carry out certain investigation and the necessary upgrading works to the slope. An Order may also be recommended to be issued after a slope failure has occurred, or as a result of other stability concerns brought to the attention of the GEO. The cumulative number of slopes on which Orders have been served by the Buildings Department is shown in Figure 2.



Figure 2 : Cumulative Number of Slopes on Which DH Orders Have Been Served

Figure 2 : Cumulative Number of Slopes on Which DH Orders Have Been Served

 

Special LPM Studies

From time to time, the GEO carries out special studies related to LPM. These studies include :

*

Mid-levels Studies (carried out between 1979 and 1981, resulting in substantial LPM stabilization works),

*

North Point Rock Slope Study (carried out between 1979 and 1981, resulting in substantial LPM stabilization works),

*

Studies of slopes affecting squatters (on-going since 1982),

*

Study of slopes along some Water Supplies Department catchwaters (carried out in 1984, resulting in substantial LPM stabilization works and squatter clearance),

*

Studies of slopes affecting the Kowloon Canton Railway (carried out between 1984 and 1990, resulting in substantial LPM stabilization works),

*

Studies of Seymour Cliffs above Conduit Road (carried out in 1991 and 1992, resulting in substantial LPM stabilization works),

*

Study of slopes affecting bus shelters (carried out in 1994),

* Masonry Wall Studies (completed in 1996),

* Formulation of New Priority Classification Systems (completed in 1996),

* Quantitative Risk Assessment (on-going since 1993),

* Systematic Inspection of Slopes in the Territory (completed in June 1997),

* Systematic Identification and Registration of Slopes in the Territory (completed in September 1998),

* Risk assessment of landslides and boulder falls from natural terrain (interim risk guidelines recommended in 1998),

* Natural terrain landslide study (completed in 2000, resulting in the compilation of a landslide inventory and promulgation of guidance on assessment of natural terrain),

* Business Process Re-engineering on selection of slopes for LPM action (design phase completed in February 1999, trial implementation completed in February 2000 and now adopted in the LPM process),

* Study of slopes affecting schools (carried out between 1995 and 1998, resulting in the identification of some 400 substandard private and government slopes for follow-up actions which were completed in June 2000),

* Territory-wide quantitative risk assessment of boulder fall hazards (completed in April 2002),


* Natural terrain hazard studies (on-going since 2000),

* Study on mitigation measures against natural terrain landslide hazards (on-going since 2001), and

* Study on use of bioengineering measures to repair natural terrain landslide scars (completed in March 2007)

Upgrading Works to Old Government Slopes

Where old Government slopes are found to be below current safety standards, they are recommended for upgrading works. The programme of Government slopes selected for detailed studies and upgrading works is referred to an inter-departmental committee, the Landslip Preventive Measures Committee (LPMC) for consideration, advice and agreement. The LPMC also considers nominations for upgrading works by Government departments responsible for slope maintenance. Figure 3 shows the number of Government slopes upgraded by the GEO on behalf of other Government departments.


Figure 3 : Numbers of Government Slopes Upgraded by GEO on Behalf of Other Government Departments as at 30.9.2005

Figure 3 : Numbers of Government Slopes Upgraded by GEO on Behalf of
Other Government Departments as at 30.9.2009

Government slopes are included in the LPM Programme under several categories. These include:

(a)    Slopes classified as consequence-to-life Category 1 (i.e. previously denoted as high consequence with respect to loss of life in the event of failure). These are generally slopes close to occupied buildings.
(b)    Slopes classified as economic consequence Category A (i.e. previously denoted as high economic consequence). These are slopes which would cause significant disruption to the public in the event of a failure. They include slopes on major transport routes and, since 1995, selected slopes affecting busy roads and footpaths.
(c)    Slopes affecting cul-de-sac roads. These are slopes along roads where, in the event of a failure, access for essential services would be totally interrupted because there is no other access available.

(d) Slopes categorized as having high indirect consequence-to-life with respect to loss of life in the event of failure. These are slopes affecting access to hospitals, fire stations, airport navigational facilities and the like.

The number of slopes in each of these categories that have been upgraded under the LPM Programme is shown in Figure 4.

 

Figure 4 : Different Categories of Slopes Upgraded under the LPM Programme

Figure 4: Different Categories of Slopes Upgraded under the LPM Programme

 

 

Year-by-year information on the number of slopes upgraded under the LPM Programme and on LPM expenditure is given in Table 1 below.

Table 1 : Expenditure and Numbers of Slopes Upgraded under the LPM Programme

Table 1 : Expenditure and Numbers of Slopes Upgraded under the LPM Programme


# Figures include cost for urgent repair works to slopes on Government land and other special studies
+ Figures up to 30.9.2009



Acceleration of LPM Programme

In 1991, streamlined procedures were introduced to boost the output of Preliminary and Detailed Studies (see Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). In 1992, a programme was implemented to use private sector resources to expedite the progress of the LPM Programme.

As part of the implementation of the recommendations of the Slope Safety Review Report issued by the Works Bureau and endorsed by the Executive Council in February 1995, the GEO received increased resources to further accelerate the LPM Programme. Over the five years commencing on 1 April 1995, the target was to complete the investigation and the necessary upgrading works on some 800 substandard government slopes in the 1977/78 Catalogue of Slopes affecting occupied buildings, schools, hospitals, etc., including selected slopes affecting busy roads and footpaths, by increasing the number of in-house staff and engaging more consultants. Slopes identified in the re-cataloguing exercise as presenting an immediate and obvious danger were also investigated and upgraded under the 5-year Accelerated LPM Project.

10-Year Extended (2000 – 2010) LPM Project

As a result of the acceleration of the LPM Programme since 1 April 1995, the output in terms of detailed studies and upgrading works by the GEO has increased significantly (see Figure 1(b) and Table 1). The acceleration of the LPM Programme was originally arranged as a 5-year project to end in March 2000. As part of Government's long-term strategy for upgrading and maintaining slopes registered in the New Catalogue of Slopes, the 10-year Extended LPM Project was launched in April 2000. This project will deal with high-priority (in terms of potential loss of life due to landslides) old (i.e. pre-GEO) slopes in the New Catalogue of Slopes that do not meet the current safety standards. Slopes are selected for action under the 10-year Extended LPM Project in accordance with a risk-based priority ranking system. The target is to upgrade another 2,500 substandard Government slopes and to complete detailed studies (safety-screening studies) for another 3,000 private slopes by the year 2010. As before, consultants will be employed in addition to deployment of in-house staff resources to undertake the project.

A breakdown of the slopes upgraded under the 10-year Extended LPM Project is shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b).

Figure 5 : Breakdown of Slopes Upgraded under the 10-Year Extended LPM Project

Figure 5 : Breakdown of Slopes Upgraded under the 10-Year Extended LPM Project

 

Post-2010 Landslip Prevention and Mitigation Program

The GEO has launched a long-term Landslip Prevention and Mitigation Programme (LPMitP) to dovetail with the 10-year Extended LPM Project, which is due for completion in 2010. The LPMitP will be implemented on a rolling basis with the following annual output:

(a) upgrade 150 government man-made slopes;

(b) conduct safety-screening studies for 100 private man-made slopes; and

(c) implement studies and necessary risk mitigation works for 30 natural hillside catchments.

Geotechnical Engineering Office
Civil Engineering and Development Department

October 2009